Hey Mark,
I created the empty structure:
https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/
regarding the pom.xml "layout", please inherit from MyFaces_version:6:
<parent>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces</groupId>
<artifactId>myfaces</artifactId>
<version>6</version>
</parent>
https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/validator/trunk/pom.xml
Ah, during that I noticed the "scripting" extension is not following
that pattern;
will fix that soon :-)
If you need more, ping us here; Patches are supposed to be submitted
against this jira instance,
eh... nothing like that is there yet ... Ok.. :-)
-Matthias
-Matthias
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>> Oki, sounds good to me!
>>>
>>> Which things to start with?
>>>
>>> As I already explained, there may be a few scopes which might ease the life
>>> of a JSF developer.
>>>
>>> Another area are interceptors. Doing a @Transactional interceptor is pretty
>>> easy. @Secured interceptor? just a few ideas...
>>>
>>> And who is doing the project setup?
>>
>> here; the empty folder structure is enough, right ?
>
> what name should we use "cdi" or "openwebbeans" ?
>
> I think that CDI is probably enough..
>
> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/
>
> We would have a
> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi
> SOON..
>
> -Matthias
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 1/15/10, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [TOMAHAWK] CDI contributions to tomahawk?
>>>> To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>> Date: Friday, January 15, 2010, 1:43 AM
>>>> also +1 for a new extensions module!
>>>>
>>>> ..and I'd really like to contribute to that too :)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jakob
>>>>
>>>> 2010/1/15 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for a new extensions
>>>> module
>>>> regards,gerhard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>
>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>> Courses in English and German
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/1/14 Matthias Wessendorf
>>>> <mat...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hey Mark,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi folks!
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > I'm working on the Apache Implementation of
>>>> JSR-299 OpenWebBeans and I'm looking forward to add more
>>>> support for JSF-2 via providing portable CDI extensions.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > I already implemented an Extension for the
>>>> javax.faces.beans.ViewScoped in our openwebbeans-jsf module,
>>>> but honestly think that this is not the right place, because
>>>> it is really CDI-container independent. Plus, I have a few
>>>> other ideas which may serve the Apache JSF community.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > So, because those extensions are both JSF container
>>>> independent and also CDI container independent, what about
>>>> adding them to tomahawk-2 ?
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > The extensions I have in mind are
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > 1.) moving the CDI support for the @ViewScoped as
>>>> mentioned above from openwebbeans-jsf to tomahawk.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > 2.) a new @ViewConversationScoped. Usually
>>>> @ConversationScoped beans have the same lifecycle as
>>>> @RequestScoped beans if no Conversation#begin() will get
>>>> called in an action. Which means that one will always get a
>>>> fresh instance of a @ConversationScoped bean if e.g. the
>>>> validation fails before the begin() can be called. The
>>>> lifecycle of @ViewConversationScoped bean would begin with
>>>> the first view invocation and end at the end of the request
>>>> in which the conversation gets closed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> that's neat;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > 3.) a new @ViewRequestScoped. This is basically the
>>>> same as @ViewScoped, but the contextual instance will stay
>>>> available until the end of the request and will not get
>>>> destroyed after the action continues on a return
>>>> "nextPage";. This may be tricky if the following
>>>> view accesses the same bean as the previous view - any
>>>> suggestions on how this should behave are welcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> not sure I get that :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > wdyt?
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > a) is tomahawk the right place (at least for 2 and
>>>> 3)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> Why not adding to here:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/commons/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That would make them also independent for a certain
>>>> component suite ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > b) would the functionality be useful for JSF-2
>>>> developers?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sounds useful to me!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> > txs and LieGrue,
>>>>
>>>> > strub
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
