On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > as i know the next seam version will provide portable cdi extensions.
lgpl => not suitable :-) > i also thought about suggesting an extensions module for myfaces which > provides such portable cdi extensions (for jsf applications). > so i created [1] to collect some ideas. Let's do stuff here, in myfaces; would be a nice "cross-community" effort (OWB meets MyFaces) -Matthias > regards, > gerhard > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extensions/CDI/DevDoc/Drafts > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > 2010/1/15 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> >> Hey Mark, >> >> I created the empty structure: >> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/ >> >> regarding the pom.xml "layout", please inherit from MyFaces_version:6: >> <parent> >> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces</groupId> >> <artifactId>myfaces</artifactId> >> <version>6</version> >> </parent> >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/validator/trunk/pom.xml >> >> >> Ah, during that I noticed the "scripting" extension is not following >> that pattern; >> will fix that soon :-) >> >> If you need more, ping us here; Patches are supposed to be submitted >> against this jira instance, >> eh... nothing like that is there yet ... Ok.. :-) >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Oki, sounds good to me! >> >>> >> >>> Which things to start with? >> >>> >> >>> As I already explained, there may be a few scopes which might ease the >> >>> life of a JSF developer. >> >>> >> >>> Another area are interceptors. Doing a @Transactional interceptor is >> >>> pretty easy. @Secured interceptor? just a few ideas... >> >>> >> >>> And who is doing the project setup? >> >> >> >> here; the empty folder structure is enough, right ? >> > >> > what name should we use "cdi" or "openwebbeans" ? >> > >> > I think that CDI is probably enough.. >> > >> > https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/ >> > >> > We would have a >> > https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi >> > SOON.. >> > >> > -Matthias >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> txs and LieGrue, >> >>> strub >> >>> >> >>> --- On Fri, 1/15/10, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> From: Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> >> >>>> Subject: Re: [TOMAHAWK] CDI contributions to tomahawk? >> >>>> To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> >> >>>> Date: Friday, January 15, 2010, 1:43 AM >> >>>> also +1 for a new extensions module! >> >>>> >> >>>> ..and I'd really like to contribute to that too :) >> >>>> >> >>>> Regards, >> >>>> Jakob >> >>>> >> >>>> 2010/1/15 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 for a new extensions >> >>>> module >> >>>> regards,gerhard >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> http://www.irian.at >> >>>> >> >>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >> >>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >> >>>> Courses in English and German >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> 2010/1/14 Matthias Wessendorf >> >>>> <mat...@apache.org> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Hey Mark, >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> > Hi folks! >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > I'm working on the Apache Implementation of >> >>>> JSR-299 OpenWebBeans and I'm looking forward to add more >> >>>> support for JSF-2 via providing portable CDI extensions. >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > I already implemented an Extension for the >> >>>> javax.faces.beans.ViewScoped in our openwebbeans-jsf module, >> >>>> but honestly think that this is not the right place, because >> >>>> it is really CDI-container independent. Plus, I have a few >> >>>> other ideas which may serve the Apache JSF community. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > So, because those extensions are both JSF container >> >>>> independent and also CDI container independent, what about >> >>>> adding them to tomahawk-2 ? >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > The extensions I have in mind are >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > 1.) moving the CDI support for the @ViewScoped as >> >>>> mentioned above from openwebbeans-jsf to tomahawk. >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > 2.) a new @ViewConversationScoped. Usually >> >>>> @ConversationScoped beans have the same lifecycle as >> >>>> @RequestScoped beans if no Conversation#begin() will get >> >>>> called in an action. Which means that one will always get a >> >>>> fresh instance of a @ConversationScoped bean if e.g. the >> >>>> validation fails before the begin() can be called. The >> >>>> lifecycle of @ViewConversationScoped bean would begin with >> >>>> the first view invocation and end at the end of the request >> >>>> in which the conversation gets closed. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> that's neat; >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > 3.) a new @ViewRequestScoped. This is basically the >> >>>> same as @ViewScoped, but the contextual instance will stay >> >>>> available until the end of the request and will not get >> >>>> destroyed after the action continues on a return >> >>>> "nextPage";. This may be tricky if the following >> >>>> view accesses the same bean as the previous view - any >> >>>> suggestions on how this should behave are welcome. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> not sure I get that :-) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > wdyt? >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > a) is tomahawk the right place (at least for 2 and >> >>>> 3)? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> No. >> >>>> >> >>>> Why not adding to here: >> >>>> >> >>>> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/commons/ >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> or >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/ >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> That would make them also independent for a certain >> >>>> component suite ;-) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > b) would the functionality be useful for JSF-2 >> >>>> developers? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> sounds useful to me! >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -Matthias >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > txs and LieGrue, >> >>>> >> >>>> > strub >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> >> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >>>> >> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >>>> >> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
