Hi I agree with Jakob.
Just a small comment, doing some black box tests between myfaces and ri I notice long time ago that ri cannot read faces-config.xml without have version 2.0 in that file. It seems they fix that but a side effect is what we are seeing right now (facelets taglibs 1.1.x read). I think myfaces is doing right and really ri is mixing the two config files by some unknown reason. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2010/2/9 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> > On my opinion you have to differentiate between 1.x taglibs and 2.0 taglibs > in some way, because MyFaces cannot know if this taglib will or won't run. > If you can ensure that your 1.x-taglib runs with facelets 2.0 you simply > have to add version="2.0" to your taglib and it will function properly. > > This is also specified in the spec (although completely hidden in the > appendix): take a look at the xsd type definition of > facelet-taglib-versionType. It says "This type contains the recognized > versions of facelet-taglib supported." and "2.0" is the only allowed value > for this attribute. > > Regards, > Jakob > > 2010/2/9 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > > Deplyoing very simple JARs, like: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12435313/MyFaces_Test.jar >> >> should work, out of the box. Doesn't the spec explicitly talk about this >> for backward compatibility? >> Sure, when you extend the "old" Facelets classes, you have to have it >> deployed >> as well (and there is some parameter to disable Facelets2) >> >> -Matthias >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >
