... on the other hand, the EG says, that JSF2.0 RT can be used to deploy a JSF1.2 based application. Since Facelets was just some random proprietary framework, ignoring the "old" Facelets DTD is I think correct;
Still it is IMO a bit lame. -Matthias On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > maybe I am conservative, but I doubt that it is a bug, to allow "old" > facelets-based tag JARs. > You are saying it is, right ? > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I agree with Jakob. >> >> Just a small comment, doing some black box tests between myfaces and ri I >> notice long time ago that ri cannot read faces-config.xml without have >> version 2.0 in that file. It seems they fix that but a side effect is what >> we are seeing right now (facelets taglibs 1.1.x read). I think myfaces is >> doing right and really ri is mixing the two config files by some unknown >> reason. >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2010/2/9 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> >>> >>> On my opinion you have to differentiate between 1.x taglibs and 2.0 >>> taglibs in some way, because MyFaces cannot know if this taglib will or >>> won't run. If you can ensure that your 1.x-taglib runs with facelets 2.0 you >>> simply have to add version="2.0" to your taglib and it will function >>> properly. >>> >>> This is also specified in the spec (although completely hidden in the >>> appendix): take a look at the xsd type definition of >>> facelet-taglib-versionType. It says "This type contains the recognized >>> versions of facelet-taglib supported." and "2.0" is the only allowed value >>> for this attribute. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> 2010/2/9 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>>> >>>> Deplyoing very simple JARs, like: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12435313/MyFaces_Test.jar >>>> >>>> should work, out of the box. Doesn't the spec explicitly talk about this >>>> for backward compatibility? >>>> Sure, when you extend the "old" Facelets classes, you have to have it >>>> deployed >>>> as well (and there is some parameter to disable Facelets2) >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
