Hi Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
regards, Leonardo Uribe 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> > I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, I > just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;) > > Regards, > Jakob > > 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > > Yeah, I understand that. >> >> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :) >> >> -Matthias >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: >> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might >> reveal >> > other issues ... >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Ganesh >> > >> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >> >> >> Again... >> >> >> >> MYFACES-2543 >> >> >> >> *snip* >> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is >> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an application >> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the >> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration >> >> parameters. >> >> *snip* >> >> >> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the >> >> bug open ;-) >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >
