+1 on sooner arrival as later. Current behavior is just lame

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
> should support "old" facelets taglibs.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this
>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment,
>>> I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I understand that.
>>>>
>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might
>>>> > reveal
>>>> > other issues ...
>>>> >
>>>> > Best regards,
>>>> > Ganesh
>>>> >
>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Again...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> MYFACES-2543
>>>> >>
>>>> >> *snip*
>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is
>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an
>>>> >> application
>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the
>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration
>>>> >> parameters.
>>>> >> *snip*
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the
>>>> >> bug open ;-)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -Matthias
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to