but... the spec *clearly* says that if you extend from OLD facelet classes, you have to have to ship it.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get > ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not > give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file. > > regards, > > Leonardo Uribe > > 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> >> >> Hi Leo, >> >> It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in >> TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in >> this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly >> should support "old" facelets taglibs. >> >> Regards, >> Jakob >> >> 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this >>> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide >>> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing >>> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Leonardo Uribe >>> >>> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, >>>> I just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jakob >>>> >>>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I understand that. >>>>> >>>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :) >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: >>>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might >>>>> > reveal >>>>> > other issues ... >>>>> > >>>>> > Best regards, >>>>> > Ganesh >>>>> > >>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Again... >>>>> >> >>>>> >> MYFACES-2543 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> *snip* >>>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is >>>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an >>>>> >> application >>>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the >>>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration >>>>> >> parameters. >>>>> >> *snip* >>>>> >> >>>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the >>>>> >> bug open ;-) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -Matthias >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
