Hi If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file.
regards, Leonardo Uribe 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> > Hi Leo, > > It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in > TagLibraryConfig to make "old" libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in > this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly > should support "old" facelets taglibs. > > Regards, > Jakob > > 2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> > > Hi >> >> Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this >> should work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide >> something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing >> something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that. >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> >> >> I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, I >>> just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> 2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>> >>> Yeah, I understand that. >>>> >>>> Any interest in helping with the fix ? :) >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: >>>> > Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might >>>> reveal >>>> > other issues ... >>>> > >>>> > Best regards, >>>> > Ganesh >>>> > >>>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>>> >> >>>> >> Again... >>>> >> >>>> >> MYFACES-2543 >>>> >> >>>> >> *snip* >>>> >> If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in JSF 2.0 is >>>> >> backwards compatible with pre-JSF 2.0 Facelets and such an >>>> application >>>> >> must not continue to bundle the Facelets jar file along with the >>>> >> application, and must not continue to set the Facelets configuration >>>> >> parameters. >>>> >> *snip* >>>> >> >>>> >> So, this is actually blocking a reasonable use-case. Please keep the >>>> >> bug open ;-) >>>> >> >>>> >> -Matthias >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>> >> >
