Hi,
On 2007-02-08, at 08:31 , Marko Moeller wrote:
Hi Louis @all,
one reason, we don't use bouncer at the moment is that it don`t
support ftp.
Ok.
The other (and for me the most important) reason is, that we have no
direct access to the interface in order to make needed changes
quick as
possible
(without involving other persons for this job).
Ok
If the second issue could be fixed (getting access to the interface) I
think we will find a way to offer the de builts on bouncer too.
The idea using GeoIP Sourceforge sounds good and could prevent longer
download times.
These are good points. I'll communicate them to Corey at OSU.
Kind Regards
Marko
Best,
louis
sophie wrote:
Hi Louis,
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
All,
As many of you are aware, we use "Bouncer" for downloads. [0]
This is
a sophisticated (to me, anyway) download mechanism that more or less
does what load balancing does: it alleviates downloaders of
confusing
choice and chooses available servers that have the application.
Each
mirror is still responsible for having the files but users are not
responsible for finding them.
This is something that has been reported as very annoying during
SL2007 hence my request on [EMAIL PROTECTED] because some of our users have
seen their download time much longer than usually (from 5 hours to 7
or 8 hours). Could we add the GeoIP Sourceforge is using as Shaun
pointed it ?
Kind regards
Sophie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
