On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:07 AM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 09:48, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Releasing the full source does sound easier for processes, so if > reviewers are ok with that, sounds good to me. Should be possible to only > upload specific NBMs. I guess the question is when we do the update, given > the refactoring is broken for 9+. > > I'm thinking maybe ~2 weeks? Given there is a workaround > (uninstalling nb-javac) and the potential for other things that have > been mentioned to maybe require fixes, we could aim for a patch > release then? > > In the meantime, could we also provide an additional update centre for > nb-javac so that people who want to can install and test the fixed > version? And is the fixed version ready yet anyway? > Should be this, I believe: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1589 I would like to try myself, to check that things are working, but didn't get to that. > Still unsure about how we handle catalog and signing issues though. > Am I right in thinking with current situation people will see a > warning on update? Definitely see this already when re-enabling > nb-javac. > That is one of the things I'd like to try. The update will be a two phase process - first update the nb/updatecenters module, and then nb-javac. I *think* there should be no warning for the second update (because the NBM is signed using the key that is embedded in the updatecenters module), but I am less sure about how exactly the first update will work. Jan > How do we address that? Can we add anything in to our existing build > process within that timeframe? > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
