-1 "Can't be opened because Apple cannot check for malicious software"
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:26 AM Neil C Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 09:54, Eric Barboni <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sha512 and key from Reema is ok it means this can be released on dist. > > Not functional is another point. But Reema can cancel if tester on MacOS > found issue. > > Distribution on dist requires more than that, and we also discussed > requiring more ourselves. The wording that was discussed, that I > thought you said you agreed with, said that all voters must verify all > checksums and keys (including the additional keys in the installers!), > check they function, and verify that they only install artefacts built > from the released sources. I don't see any point in voting on > binaries if we're not requiring checks on all those things that the > PMC must check. > > Anyway, let's not hijack the vote thread further on this. > > I'd like to hear Reema's opinion on pulling and re-voting on macOS > installers because of the notarization issue though. > > Thanks and best wishes, > > Neil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > -- Carl J. Mosca
