Installed in MacOSX 10.9.5 (old I know) using JDK12.0.2. Installation went smoothly. Migrated plugins etc. from 11.1 installation without issues.
nb-javac and JavaFX were installed successfully. Opened/executed a number of projects. No issues. RCP projects, however, throw strange errors: layer.xml: Element type "filesystem" must be declared. I.e. same issue as in windows. Investigating... Can't vote for +1. Kind regards, John. On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 04:57, constantin drabo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > Environment : MacOS Mojave , 16Go , JDK 8 and JDK13 > Installation wizard : Done with success > Create Java project : Done with success > Create Java Web application : Done with success > Verdict : +1 > > Constantin > > ?? La Terre est le berceau de l'humanit??, mais on ne passe pas sa vie > enti??re dans un berceau. ?? > - Constantin????E. Tsiolkovski , p??re de l'astronautique?? et de > l'a??rospatiale modernes. > ________________________________ > De : John Mc <[email protected]> > Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2019 06:36 > À : [email protected] <[email protected]> > Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.2 macOS Installer > > +1 > > Regards > > John > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 18:12, Geertjan Wielenga <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:56 PM Carl Mosca <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Meaning the installer does not work if you have the latest/current > > release > > > of the OS running. > > > > > > > 'But you can ignore it. "Run anyway" so to speak. It's not that it blocks > > you, it just warns you and makes it more steps to run potentially harmful > > software. Anything executed from command line will execute like normal, > and > > I believe also if you alt-click and select open.' > > > > > > > https://www.macrumors.com/2019/09/03/apple-macos-catalina-notarization-mac-apps/ > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:39 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This came up during last release, I had raised an infra ticket for > > > > notarization - INFRA-18790 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18790>, but it failed > > with > > > > a long list of errors. > > > > > > > > This needs investigation, I haven't been able to get to it yet. > > > > > > > > So, I agree with Geertjan's suggestion to add note that installer > works > > > > for 10.13.x and 10.14.x macOS releases and is pending notarization > that > > > > is required for 10.15.x release. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Reema > > > > > > > > On 28/10/19 5:43 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > > > > We could add on the Download page that the installer for Mac OSX > has > > > been > > > > > signed but not notarized ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__developer.apple.com_documentation_security_notarizing-5Fyour-5Fapp-5Fbefore-5Fdistribution&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=I_-Y15BecdUmuYLJbvbi0hFUs7JgHZnV_jPFSP8DQF0&m=AU5axCXNKWDQypYO5D1OcvSHUynS_-Wl1_0S-laIHDc&s=e05RMNxX87RB32yCeA9JWFLooi2yfatEqICXh-ffoTw&e= > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > Unless Reema has a plan or someone has a plan relating to > > notarization. > > > > > Since we have it signed and it seems a lengthy Apple-driven process > > to > > > > > notarize it, I'd argue that so long as we state that clearly, this > > > should > > > > > not be a blocker for releasing the installer. > > > > > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:36 AM Carl Mosca <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> -1 > > > > >> "Can't be opened because Apple cannot check for malicious > > software" > > > > >> > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:26 AM Neil C Smith < > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 09:54, Eric Barboni <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >>>> Sha512 and key from Reema is ok it means this can be released on > > > dist. > > > > >>>> Not functional is another point. But Reema can cancel if tester > on > > > > >> MacOS > > > > >>> found issue. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Distribution on dist requires more than that, and we also > discussed > > > > >>> requiring more ourselves. The wording that was discussed, that I > > > > >>> thought you said you agreed with, said that all voters must > verify > > > all > > > > >>> checksums and keys (including the additional keys in the > > > installers!), > > > > >>> check they function, and verify that they only install artefacts > > > built > > > > >>> from the released sources. I don't see any point in voting on > > > > >>> binaries if we're not requiring checks on all those things that > the > > > > >>> PMC must check. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Anyway, let's not hijack the vote thread further on this. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I'd like to hear Reema's opinion on pulling and re-voting on > macOS > > > > >>> installers because of the notarization issue though. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Thanks and best wishes, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Neil > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >>> > > > > >>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_display_NETBEANS_Mailing-2Blists&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=I_-Y15BecdUmuYLJbvbi0hFUs7JgHZnV_jPFSP8DQF0&m=AU5axCXNKWDQypYO5D1OcvSHUynS_-Wl1_0S-laIHDc&s=XYqudrqPACu1wB_McTbfOCSjE5P-TWycb2BM7SRC_8Y&e= > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Carl J. Mosca > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carl J. Mosca > > > > > >
