+1 (changed from -1) On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:35 AM Carl Mosca <[email protected]> wrote:
> -1 > "Can't be opened because Apple cannot check for malicious software" > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:26 AM Neil C Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 09:54, Eric Barboni <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Sha512 and key from Reema is ok it means this can be released on dist. >> > Not functional is another point. But Reema can cancel if tester on >> MacOS found issue. >> >> Distribution on dist requires more than that, and we also discussed >> requiring more ourselves. The wording that was discussed, that I >> thought you said you agreed with, said that all voters must verify all >> checksums and keys (including the additional keys in the installers!), >> check they function, and verify that they only install artefacts built >> from the released sources. I don't see any point in voting on >> binaries if we're not requiring checks on all those things that the >> PMC must check. >> >> Anyway, let's not hijack the vote thread further on this. >> >> I'd like to hear Reema's opinion on pulling and re-voting on macOS >> installers because of the notarization issue though. >> >> Thanks and best wishes, >> >> Neil >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> >> >> >> > > -- > Carl J. Mosca > -- Carl J. Mosca
