Hi,
If I understand well only what we want to care of will be audited and donated.
The neglected part will not be audited nor given to Apache or individual.
Maybe we first need a list and from this list we decide.
We can use repository as placeholder to handle reception and adapt to main
repo. (easy to create, easy for pmc member) (done for i10). IMHO pure
refactoring adaption history from 4-6 years decorelated repository is not so
important to keep.
Question after that is do we want a feature to be release same pace as NetBeans
(quarterly) or do you want to have custom release like html4j,jackpot or
mavenutilies artefacts.
(html4j and mavenutilities are maven based and are better on separated
repository, easy release)
Jackpot30 looks like an example of ant built artefacts independent form main
repo. We release 3-4 time as incubation, not sure we do one as TLP but that not
an issue.
We receive, we slice we "fit the pieces together" and we prepare release :D
Best Regards
Eric
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Sven Reimers <sven.reim...@gmail.com>
Envoyé : jeudi 13 février 2020 20:54
À : dev <dev@netbeans.apache.org>
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up Oracle's donation of NetBeans to Apache
Okay. Let's look at this in more detail:
1. major features like python and xml-schema or similar
-> should get back into a primary place, e.g. own cluster for python maybe
own cluster for xml-schema (could be consolidated with other xml-tooling).
2. single / simple feature modules from contrib
-> vote if they should get directly promoted to default NetBeans or kept
separate. For me this looks like a case by case decision.
If we want to have the code at Apache I would assume we want to ship it as well.
On the other hand I like the idea of having something like incubating modules,
which can be accessed via a special update center... Once they are mature
enough we just ship the code...
Not sure how this may end up in the actual repository structure, but special
clusters seem to be a good idea.
-Sven
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 7:34 PM Jesse Glick <typr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:27 AM Sven Reimers <sven.reim...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I would assume that all things we pick up from the remaining stuff
> > will
> end
> > up in the main NetBeans repository
>
> OK, in that case I guess they would be dumped in
> `nbbuild/cluster.properties#nb.cluster.betauc` until someone decides
> to promote them? (And fold the contents of `nb.cluster.experimental`
> into that? I am not sure what the real distinction is.)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
--
Sven Reimers
* Java Champion
* Apache NetBeans PMC: http://netbeans.apache.org
* JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: https://www.meetup.com/JUG-Bodensee
* Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009 & 2018
* LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
