Hi, Couple of comments inline - firstly, have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LEGAL/issues/LEGAL-563 Hopefully OK?
It's not like it's asking any more than https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-489 mind you, but hopefully updated info might help! :-\ On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 07:45, Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]> wrote: > It always depends how one tells the story. I want to find arguments for Apache > NetBeans to bundle `nb-javac` along with the convenience binaries. When I say > "the only purpose" I want to stress that the maintainers of `nb-javac` really > want it to be used that way. True! And as maintainers that makes sense. From the ASF / NetBeans as consumer angle, IMO it's a positive if it's a library that has other users than just us. And the "entirely separate from our products" argument is a little easier. > > And > > published via Oracle namespace in future? > > I am quite happy with current setup where Toni uploads the binaries to Maven > central. I have no intention to change it[1]. Given that one concern (from legal) is ensuring CPE applies, eg. that all source files used to create the resulting binary are subject to CPE, it *might* be easier if the binary we consume was built by and from *a* namespace belonging to the copyright holder, and with explicit CPE license attached. Let's see what we get back. Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
