Hi all,
As you may know we're polishing a subset of the cnd donation (with an
editor with lexer, folding, formatting, the C/C++ makefile projects and
the toolchain (as well as dlight).
The fact is that both cpplite and cnd clash in the "commit-validation"
test when both of them want to create the "Options/C++" dialog pane (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-6372).
It seems we could handle this in different ways:
Option 1:
Use a "weight" attribute in layer.xml registration [1], so both
"cpplite.editor" and "cnd.editor" can register the "C/C++" pane, but
only one "wins" depending on the weight. Sadly this attribute is not
currently supported in the OptionsDialog (nor in commit-validation
test?), and adding it just for this corner case seems too much, I think.
Option 2:
Make "cpplite.editor" depend on "cnd.editor". This will make the cpplite
cluster depend on the cnd cluster (currently only cpplite is in the
"release" set).
Option 3:
Make "cnd.editor" depend on "cpplite.editor". This will make the cnd
cluster depend on the cpplite cluster.
So, what say? Any preferences? Any alternatives?
Thanks,
Antonio
P.S.: Option 2 is available at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/3428
[1]
https://bz.apache.org/netbeans/show_bug.cgi?id=141925
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
