Hi,
 I have concern for the installers. Are the code change for installer to work 
only located in nbbuild/installer ?
 Maybe we could split the repo and do the main vote (including maven + vsix)

Can be like that 
 Bake the installer with help of the "new repo" delayed until some pmc +1 to 
main vote, 

 Then call for a vote with source of installers + binaries , notarized for all 
platform. With special rules asking for OS/JDK used to test the convenience, 
and 1 PMC minimum per os for vote to be successfull.  
 If an issue occurs we can redo only the installer base on the same "main 
sources"

Best Regards
Eric


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Eric Bresie <[email protected]> 
Envoyé : samedi 5 mars 2022 18:46
À : Netbeans Developer List <[email protected]>
Objet : Re: Postmortem 13

Seems to me the release went well.

Some thoughts and input from recent discussions :

   - The installer (MacOS) was a hiccup.  Hopefully that gets resolved and
   accounted for better in the future
   - The new "github issue" / pr workflow so far seemed to work well.
   Questions / Request for Input from the release team.. .  Is there any
   possible improvements on that but curious if there are any
   other improvements that could help further.
   - I seem to recall mention of making different build types  (i.e. to
   reduce some of the time for builds - like php performance hits, maybe add
   some "security/dependency" builds, code quality builds, etc.) in the in
   Github workflow
   - In the workflow, maybe agree on some further labels (i.e. release
   versions/milestones, etc.
   - Documentation/release details usage of PR base details was good, with
   the netbeans-website document updates seemed to have good.  Could any sort
   of automated generation (i.e. a template based with query of issues/pull
   during build is possible someway) would be of value?  Could create an
   initial revision then modify /edit as applicable.

Eric Bresie
[email protected]

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 1:13 PM Geertjan Wielenga <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> There may be one or two loose ends, but the 13 release cycle has now 
> come to an end (aside from Mac OS X installer convenience binary).
>
> Before moving on to the next cycle, i.e., 14, are there any comments 
> or thoughts or anything that we need to be aware of or think about for 
> next time, any new learnings or insights?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
>
> PS: 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to