Well, being stuck on Java 11 for long years i 'd love the possibility to
enjoy new language features.
A very noob question: why would I need frgaal to 'replace' javac since I
would assume that the IDE JVM would be the higher language level JVM ?
Is there some case  when NetBeans compile code without using the underlying
build system ?


Emmanuel

PS I loved the beard, I didn't recognize you at first glance
PPS: I love frgaal idea 😍



On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 2:12 PM Eric Bresie <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why can’t Frgaal just be a plug-in like nb-javac us to be or other
> languages like Kotlin or Python?
>
> Is there some inherent Netbeans infrastructure code functionality
> requiring change for this? If the suggestion is to integrate it with
> Netbeans IDE itself then I can see the hesitation.
>
> But then again, in many language case, each has the ability to provide
> alternative compilers (i.e. C/C++ for gnu, llvm, etc), or different
> distributors of open JDKs, so if this is say frgaal is an alternative
> compiler for open JDK that’s slightly different case then a single language.
>
> Maybe separate  question, is there or should there be a Netbeans API to
> have a standardized way of adding and managing Language platforms?
>
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ________________________________
> From: John Mc <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 1:31 AM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ernie Rael <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Shall NetBeans improve Java/JDK? With Frgaal?
>
> Sorry, to chime in here, I don't do much Java Development anymore, so not
> really clued in on the comings and goings of the Language too much :(
> however I do have to spend some hours every few weeks
> maintaining/supporting a Java 6 project(the client has no intention of
> paying for an JDK upgrade, the app is 20+ years old and is being replaced
> in a few years anyways), so this Frgaal peaked my interest - until I
> spotted that it only supports 1.8+.
>
> I tried googling Frgaal, and I only found 2 hits:
>
>    - http://frgaal.org
>    - http://wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/Frgaal
>
> Even on twitter searches for Frgaal, don't show much mentions outside of a
> few key people...  I admit, my searches are limited and don't reflect usage
> of Frgaal, but even from those searches, Frgaal doesn't appear to be
> marketed very well in the Java ecosystem.  It looks like Frgaal is a pet
> project, an interesting one, but one that's still trying to find a space in
> the JDK ecosystem.
>
> So I would question, why at this stage in Frgaal life - what benefit will
> it bring to NetBeans if we package support for it?  I can't see it bringing
> any users to our IDE, so why would we put it directly into NetBeans... Can
> support for Frgaal be added to the IDE via a plugin?  If so, we should
> recommend the authors of Frgaal to use this route, as a way of getting IDE
> support.  If I remember correctly, they don't have to distribute it solely
> through our potentially dead plugin portal, they could distribute it
> themselves right?
>
> If and when Frgaal gains traction, then we can consider adding it to
> NetBeans as a first class citizen, but until it has traction why bother,
> when it won't bring us anything but code we might need to remove later on
> if the author loses interest in Frgaal?
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 at 04:35, Michael Bien <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 06.10.22 19:01, Ernie Rael wrote:
> > >
> > > -1 to DISCUSSION? Wow. That's pretty draconian.
> > >
> > I mean the apache process is fairly democratic. A negative vote only
> > conveys exactly that: a negative vote. This is no veto.
> >
> > This is also not a -1 to the discussion. Keep discussing :)
> >
> > Also please keep in mind that the context of this discussion is a second
> > mail thread and a PR. This mail was a summary of my opinion on that
> > topic since nobody likes to read long mails (the bullet point version
> > already got too long).
> >
> > best regards,
> >
> > michael
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to