Thanks, it was a small fun clean up task. Gj
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, that was very effective! > > My concern was that sample code should not trigger any licensing > thoughts. In that light Apache or BSD doesn't matter. > > Since it's designed to be used as a starting point it should be Public > Domain. > > Of course, everybody treats sample code as Public Domain, but that's > another matter. > > > --emi > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > OK, done, including references in various supporting files, and did a > build > > and run to check everything still works and resolved the issue: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-62 > > > > Gj > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> Those specific files, i.e., the samples relating to the NetBeans > Platform > >> (FeedReader, PaintApp, OSGIDemo and maybe another one or two) should > simply > >> be deleted, they're old and out of date and it would simplify things > simply > >> not having them. > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-62 > >> > >> I'm planning to delete them today. > >> > >> Gj > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > >> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> >> ...some files in the repository (typically samples) are using > 3-clause > >>> (if I get that correctly) BSD license... > >>> > >>> If those files have been donated to Apache they can be relicensed, and > >>> IMO they should, in order to simplify things. > >>> > >>> -Bertrand > >>> > >> > >> >
