Hi, On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:58 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > ...But it's a bit silly no? Any new project based on an Apache sample > would have to post a notice about the Apache > > license and include a copy of the license.... > > So we do require some consistency to make things easier. The Apache > License is one of those invariants. > > Also, if our sample code turns into the next Google, we want to be > credited for that - it's the only thing we'd get ;-) > > Kind of understand both points of view there, but veering more to Emi's on this particular point. My concern would be more about how we handle code generated by wizards, templates, etc. The example projects are one end of the scale there, but there are other project and file templates that generate quite a lot of code, and I assume we wouldn't want the output of them to be under any kind of license?! Just wondering where the line gets drawn here? Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith Artist & Technologist www.neilcsmith.net Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
