On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 11:18, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: >Surely > the sources of that installer themselves are not required to be part of the > release too?
That (or a separately voted on source release / third-party dependency) would exactly be my expectation, yes. IMO it should always be possible for anyone to take the source release and build the installers entirely from source without relying on anything that hasn't been released. That's my interpretation from both the Apache guidelines and how other FLOSS projects work, but the easiest thing would surely be just to get clarification one way or another whether this would be breaking Apache policy so merging can be considered if required? Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
