Yes, how do we get this resolved, ask our mentors or open a legal issue or what do you suggest?
Gj On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 12:31, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 11:18, Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > >Surely > > the sources of that installer themselves are not required to be part of > the > > release too? > > That (or a separately voted on source release / third-party > dependency) would exactly be my expectation, yes. IMO it should > always be possible for anyone to take the source release and build the > installers entirely from source without relying on anything that > hasn't been released. That's my interpretation from both the Apache > guidelines and how other FLOSS projects work, but the easiest thing > would surely be just to get clarification one way or another whether > this would be breaking Apache policy so merging can be considered if > required? > > Best wishes, > > Neil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
