Ok so looks like the major players for the 0.5.1 release are in. Today during some testing it was discovered that there can be issues with multiple HDFS processors with differing configurations and yesterday on StackOverflow it was reported that there are some issues talking to Kafka but there is a viable workaround for now. I personally feel like what we have for an 0.5.1 is good right now without those two JIRAs and that we could do an 0.5.2 if those get sorted soon or they can go in 0.6.0 which if we stick to the previously discussed idea would be mid-March.
What do ya'll think? If we did a kick-off of RC say late Sunday (assuming RM is on board too of course) we'd be looking at a midweek release for 0.5.1 Thanks Joe On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> All, >> Just so we're clear, my expectations is that the fixes we need above will >> go into master (0.6.0-SNAPSHOT). I (or the contributor) will attempt to >> also apply those fixes to a branch I made off of nifi-0.5.0, called >> "support/nifi-0.5.x", and when done we can test and when satisfied, start >> the 0.5.1 release process. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I lieu of a decision on a git branching strategy, does anyone object to me >>> naming a branch "support/0.5.x" so I can start pulling together 0.5.1? >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Team, >>>> >>>> First, congrats on getting 0.5.0 out the door. Very nice release with >>>> excellent new features, enhancements, and bug fixes with involvement >>>> of many new contributors. >>>> >>>> The effort toward 0.6.0 is well underway and if we are shooting for >>>> our original target would still arrive around mid march-ish. Seems >>>> reasonable given progress so far. >>>> >>>> That said, I'd like to propose we go ahead and put out an 0.5.1 as >>>> soon as the patches are addressed. The finding that Lars helped >>>> expose and that Mark Payne is now working [1] in my view warrants a >>>> release by itself as it is data loss related. Also, we can address >>>> the work Matt Gilman is doing to ensure properly authorized users can >>>> access resources they're being blocked by [2] and the license/notice >>>> findings Sean discovered during the last release [3]. There are a >>>> couple odd/ends in the list as well [4]. Purely a bug fix release as >>>> spec'd out in release notes [5]. >>>> >>>> I checked with Tony and he is happy to continue performing RM tasks on >>>> the 0.5.x line. >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1527 >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1497 >>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1520 >>>> [4] https://s.apache.org/nifi-0.5.1-candidate >>>> [5] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Joe >>>> >>> >>>
