As a consumer of NiFi and a developer of proprietary processors I'm a little concerned by what I see here too. In fact, I'd like to read some document supporting/justifying the UI changes, which is not to say that I presume to condemn them, just that I'd like to understand the reasoning. The existing NiFi UI was already very good.
NiFi rocks; I hope it will keep rocking! On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) <pwi...@micron.com> wrote: > I created a ticket and put in a link to a mostly accurate screenshot, at > least close enough to give you a feel for what I was thinking: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2603 > > Direct screenshot link: https://goo.gl/photos/RZzz45RGeTAmWwiC7 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:46 PM > To: dev@nifi.apache.org > Subject: Re: 1.0 Run Status Colors > > no big discussion really - just contributions. If you could kick off a > JIRA and attach a screenshot of what you have in mind that could help the > discussion move along. > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) <pwi...@micron.com> > wrote: > > We've been playing with NiFi 1.0 and of course the new theme/layout is a > big change. > > One thing we don't particularly care for is the bland gray > Running/Stopped/Disabled colors. I would be willing to have them bland in > the header, but on the Processor/Process Group level I feel they really > need to be Green/Red/whatever color. > > > > I would be happy to submit the change, but I wanted to make sure there > hadn't been some kind heated discussion over colors or lack thereof before > putting in a PR. >
