+1 agreed. Much needed. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Russell Bateman < russell.bate...@perfectsearchcorp.com> wrote:
> +1 > > I like your changes, Peter! > > > On 08/23/2016 03:12 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) wrote: > >> I have the before/after Status Color images made up and listed in the >> notes on the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2603 >> >> The screenshots are perfect, as there is some tweaking left to be done, >> but it should give a clear picture of the effect the change would have. >> One issue I haven't worked out is that in some of the screenshots the >> "Issues" icon is the same orange color it is in the 1.0.0 Beta. It is >> supposed to be the color shown in the Process Group/Process before/after >> images. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:02 AM >> To: dev@nifi.apache.org >> Subject: Re: 1.0 Run Status Colors >> >> The discussion around the modernized UI goes back to start of the year. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1323 >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Redesign+ >> User+Interface >> >> UI changes are notoriously exciting and horrible and for each person they >> might feel neither, one or both of these. >> >> Peter: Thank you for providing the screenshot. To help better understand >> your suggestion can you show a before, after, and provide some text about >> the changes you'd like? >> >> Your screenshot looks great to me but it also isn't obvious what changed. >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Russell Bateman < >> russell.bate...@perfectsearchcorp.com> wrote: >> >>> As a consumer of NiFi and a developer of proprietary processors I'm a >>> little concerned by what I see here too. In fact, I'd like to read >>> some document supporting/justifying the UI changes, which is not to >>> say that I presume to condemn them, just that I'd like to understand the >>> reasoning. >>> The existing NiFi UI was already very good. >>> >>> NiFi rocks; I hope it will keep rocking! >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) >>> <pwi...@micron.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I created a ticket and put in a link to a mostly accurate screenshot, >>>> at least close enough to give you a feel for what I was thinking: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2603 >>>> >>>> Direct screenshot link: https://goo.gl/photos/RZzz45RGeTAmWwiC7 >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:46 PM >>>> To: dev@nifi.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: 1.0 Run Status Colors >>>> >>>> no big discussion really - just contributions. If you could kick off >>>> a JIRA and attach a screenshot of what you have in mind that could >>>> help the discussion move along. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) >>>> <pwi...@micron.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We've been playing with NiFi 1.0 and of course the new theme/layout >>>>> is a >>>>> >>>> big change. >>>> >>>>> One thing we don't particularly care for is the bland gray >>>>> >>>> Running/Stopped/Disabled colors. I would be willing to have them >>>> bland in the header, but on the Processor/Process Group level I feel >>>> they really need to be Green/Red/whatever color. >>>> >>>>> I would be happy to submit the change, but I wanted to make sure >>>>> there >>>>> >>>> hadn't been some kind heated discussion over colors or lack thereof >>>> before putting in a PR. >>>> >>>> >
