I like this, Matt. It has often find myself double clicking to try to configure, or view configuration. It just seems natural.
Chris McDermott Remote Business Analytics STaTS/StoreFront Remote HPE Storage Hewlett Packard Enterprise Mobile: +1 978-697-5315 On 10/24/16, 9:50 AM, "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@apache.org> wrote: +1 for avoiding confusion or changing existing behavior, but I think a good compromise is to leave the Configure option on both context menus (right-click, e.g.) and add the double-click behavior to the Processor to open the configuration dialog. In that case, the default (double-click) option for both Processors and Process Groups is no longer "nothing" and "Enter Group" respectively; rather it is conceptually something like "Drill-down". For PGs drill-down is Enter Group, for Processors you can't drill down any further than the config dialog, so that becomes the default action for double-click. Thoughts? Thanks, Matt On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Pierre Villard <pierre.villard...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep, that's a good point and I agree we should avoid confusion with > different behaviors depending of the components. > > Thanks Matt! > > Pierre > > 2016-10-24 13:44 GMT+02:00 Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>: > >> Pierre, >> >> Currently the double click action is used to enter a Process Group. >> There's been discussion in the past on this mailing about possibly using it >> to configure. My only hesitation there would be the inconsistency between >> action on the different components. Unless of course we also switch the >> action for entering a group. Then I start to worry about confusing the user >> with changing up the existing behavior too much. >> >> Matt >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Oct 24, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Pierre Villard <pierre.villard...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I was wondering if there is any reason why the double click action is not >> > used in the UI? I think this could be a nice shortcut to access >> > "Configure/View configuration" view from elements on the canvas. >> Thoughts? >> > >> > Pierre >>