Mayank, Try this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC Brandon On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:57 AM mayank rathi <mayank.ra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > How can we find out list of fixes that will go in 1.4.0 release? > > Thanks!! > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Brandon DeVries <b...@jhu.edu> wrote: > > > All, > > > > I think we should plan on calling for a vote on Friday. That gives two > > days to wrap up any outstanding tickets that anyone feels really belong > in > > 1.4. At that point the remaining tickets can be shifted to a future > > release. > > > > If there are tickets that are not getting the attention they need to make > > it into the release, let the list know. > > > > Any objections? > > > > Brandon > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:32 AM Koji Kawamura <ijokaruma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > I was able to reproduce the GenerateTableFetch processor issue > > > reported by NIFI-4395. > > > Please go ahead and provide a PR, I can review it. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Koji > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Paul Gibeault (pagibeault) > > > <pagibea...@micron.com> wrote: > > > > We have submitted this JIRA ticket: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4395 > > > > > > > > This issue causes GenerateTableFetch processor to malfunction after a > > > server restart. > > > > > > > > We are very interested in getting this released in 1.4.0 and are > > willing > > > to provide the PR if there is still time. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Paul Gibeault > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Michael Hogue [mailto:michael.p.hogu...@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:36 AM > > > > To: dev@nifi.apache.org > > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [DISCUSS} Closing in on a NiFi 1.4.0 release? > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > There are a couple of issues with open PRs that i think would be > > > desirable to get into 1.4.0: > > > > > > > > - https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2163 - trivial one-liner in > > > ListenGRPC > > > > - https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1985 - support TLS algorithm > > > selection via SSLContextService in HandleHTTPRequest > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:46 AM Mark Bean <mark.o.b...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I agree with including only those which can be completed quickly in > > > 1.4.0. > > > >> We are anxious for the next release to begin exercising some of the > > > >> new features. IMO it's time to get 1.4.0 out the door. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Mark > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Jeff <jtsw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Still good. Was looking through tickets yesterday and today and > > > >> > while review progress has been made on some PRs, it might be best > to > > > >> > move JIRAs tagged for 1.4.0 that have PRs and aren't on the cusp > of > > > >> > being committed > > > >> to > > > >> > post 1.4.0. Thoughts? > > > >> > > > > >> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:50 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Definitely agree with Brandon that due for a 1.4.0 and it has > some > > > >> > > really nice things in it.... > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Jeff Storck volunteered to RM. Jeff you still good? Anything I > > > >> > > can > > > >> help > > > >> > > with? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks > > > >> > > Joe > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Brandon DeVries <b...@jhu.edu> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > There are significant changes in 1.4.0 that I am actively > > > >> > > > waiting > > > >> on... > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:25 PM Russell Bateman < > > > >> r...@windofkeltia.com > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> I don't know. Are we due for a release? Is time-since the > > > >> significant > > > >> > > >> factor in a release cycle or is growing features part of it? > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> 1.3.0 subsists with no bump of the third digit. This is an > > > >> > > >> oddly > > > >> > stable > > > >> > > >> .0 product (though the third digit had somewhat different > > > >> > > >> semantics > > > >> in > > > >> > > >> NiFi 0.x). No bug fixes to 1.3.0 in its roughly 6-month > > history? > > > >> > That's > > > >> > > >> an achievement. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> If there have been important features worked on and ready to > > > >> > > >> go, by > > > >> > all > > > >> > > >> means, let's have 1.4.0. But if 1.4.0 is little more than > > > >> > > >> 1.3.1, > > > >> let's > > > >> > > >> rethink why we'd do that. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Russ > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> On 09/18/2017 12:08 PM, Brandon DeVries wrote: > > > >> > > >> > +1, it seems like we're do for a release. It's been a > week, > > > >> > > >> > +and a > > > >> > > couple > > > >> > > >> > of the mentioned tickets have shown progress... but a > number > > > >> > > haven't. If > > > >> > > >> > no one wants to get them wrapped up, can we put them off to > > > 1.5? > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:39 AM Wes Lawrence < > > > >> > wesleyll...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> >> I'd also like NIFI-4242 and NIFI-4181 added (or if it's > OK, > > > >> > > >> >> I can > > > >> > > label > > > >> > > >> >> their fix versions for 1.4.0. I wasn't sure sure I could > do > > > >> > > >> >> that, > > > >> > or > > > >> > > if > > > >> > > >> >> that should be left to PMC/Commiters) > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> NIFI-4242 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4242> > > > >> > > >> >> has > > > >> a > > > >> > > patch > > > >> > > >> >> with feedback, and I'll be pushing a new patch addressing > > > >> > > >> >> the > > > >> > > feedback > > > >> > > >> >> later today. > > > >> > > >> >> NIFI-4181 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4181> > > > >> > > >> >> has > > > >> a > > > >> > > patch > > > >> > > >> >> with feedback, and I'd like to address the feedback for > > > >> > > >> >> 1.4.0 if > > > >> > > >> possible. > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> --Wes > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Christopher Currie < > > > >> > > >> >> christop...@currie.com > > > >> > > >> >>> wrote: > > > >> > > >> >>> In addition to this list, I'd like to request that > > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3950 also be > > > added. > > > >> I > > > >> > > >> >> created a > > > >> > > >> >>> PR for it, and I'm happy to work with a committer to > clean > > > >> > > >> >>> it up > > > >> > for > > > >> > > >> >>> project standards if needed. > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> Christopher > > > >> > > >> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:44 AM James Wing > > > >> > > >> >>> <jvw...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> +1 It does seem to be about time to get a release out, > > > >> > > >> >>>> +and we > > > >> > > should > > > >> > > >> >>>> certainly take advantage of your offer to performing RM > > > duties. > > > >> > > Thank > > > >> > > >> >>> you > > > >> > > >> >>>> for that. > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jeff < > jtsw...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>> All, > > > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>> On the dev and users lists there have been some > questions > > > >> about > > > >> > > when > > > >> > > >> >>> the > > > >> > > >> >>>>> next release of NiFi would be. I would like perform RM > > > >> duties, > > > >> > > and > > > >> > > >> >> get > > > >> > > >> >>>>> things started on identifying what the community would > > > >> > > >> >>>>> like to > > > >> > > >> >> include > > > >> > > >> >>> in > > > >> > > >> >>>>> the release of NiFi 1.4.0 that has not already been > > > >> > > >> >>>>> reviewed > > > >> and > > > >> > > >> >>>> committed > > > >> > > >> >>>>> to master. > > > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>> There are 11 unresolved JIRAs tagged with a fix version > > > >> > > >> >>>>> of > > > >> > 1.4.0. > > > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > > > >> > > >> >>>>> 3D%20NIFI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND% > > > >> > > >> >>>>> 20fixVersion%20%3D%201.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority% > > > >> > > >> >>> 20DESC%2C%20key%20DESC > > > >> > > >> >>>>> Are there any reasons to hold off on a 1.4.0 release? > > > >> > > >> >>>>> Are > > > >> there > > > >> > > >> >>>> particular > > > >> > > >> >>>>> JIRAs that the community considers necessary to have as > > > >> > > >> >>>>> part > > > >> of > > > >> > > the > > > >> > > >> >>>>> release? Let's discuss! > > > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>> Thanks, > > > >> > > >> >>>>> Jeff > > > >> > > >> >>>>> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy > all copies of the original message. >
