When I go to contributors role I just see “Sean Busbey” - no way to see what 
e-mail. But if I type in “busbey" to add you I see “[email protected]”??





From: Sean Busbey
Sent: ‎Sunday‎, ‎May‎ ‎3‎, ‎2015 ‎6‎:‎21‎ ‎PM
To: [email protected]





hurm. The correct jira account would be "busbey". AFAICT, I still can't
assign issues to myself. I even logged out/in to make sure perms aren't
cached.

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Mark Payne <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sean,
>
>
> You are listed as a contributor already. Did somebody beat me to it, or
> was the wrong account added?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sean Busbey
> Sent: ‎Sunday‎, ‎May‎ ‎3‎, ‎2015 ‎6‎:‎00‎ ‎PM
> To: [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
> one side-effect of switching to 'patch ready' is that folks who are just in
> the default 'jira-users' group can no longer assign themselves tickets by
> clicking on "start progress."
>
> instead, folks need to get added to the "contributor" role in the jira
> admin page. Could someone add me to that group so I can assign myself
> things I'm working on?
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sure thing.
> >
> > ASF build infra maintains a jenkins job that monitors jira for new
> > patch-available tickets. For projects that set up a pre-commit jenkins
> job,
> > that build infra job will kick off a job that applies the patch and tests
> > it according to whatever a particular project wants to test.
> >
> > Usually it's things like making sure compilation & unit tests work,
> > checkstyle rules are followed, javadoc warnings don't get added, etc.
> Most
> > projects just copy a pre-commit test script from some other project; many
> > of the test scripts eventually trace back to the Hadoop project.
> >
> > The Hadoop project recently revamped their pre-commit tester so that it
> > can expressly be extended and reused by other projects. I'm already
> trying
> > to use those changes to un-fork precommit testing on the HBase project,
> so
> > adding it here will be relatively easy for me. It'll also give me a great
> > additional data point about how suitable for general use the current
> > framework is.
> >
> > It's usually called the QA bot because at the end of running tests, it
> > posts to the jira a comment under that name. The comment gives a +/- 1
> with
> > a detailed report of what was checked and, if needed, where there were
> > problems.
> >
> > Different communities place different weight on the comments from the QA
> > bot. Since it's not a PMC member it doesn't have a binding vote, so
> > committers are always free to use a judgement call to ignore part of its
> > feedback. For example, if there's a flakey test or if someone else is
> > working to unbreak a failing test that got into hte main development
> branch.
> >
> > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Sean,
> >>
> >> That sounds great to me but must admit I'm not sure we all know what
> >> it really means just yet.  Can you elaborate a bit on how you see it
> >> best working and what the QA bot will do?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> joe
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > If you're ready to start using patch-available on the regular, I'll
> >> stand
> >> > up the QA bot this weekend.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sean
> >> > On May 2, 2015 3:14 PM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> team,
> >> >>
> >> >> The ASF INFRA folks have enabled our 'patch ready' workflow.  This
> >> >> should make it easier for us to see that patches have been submitted
> >> >> and so we can prioritize getting them evaluated and merged above
> other
> >> >> work.  All you have to do is once you've made your patch and verified
> >> >> that the build is good to go just attach the patch to the JIRA ticket
> >> >> in question and select the 'Submit Patch' button.  That will change
> >> >> the status of the ticket and we can then sort on those easily.
> >> >>
> >> >> We will put together a contributor guide and document all this so it
> >> >> isn't such a guessing game as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> We're seeing some really great contribs coming in through various
> >> >> forms be it ideas, defect fixes, new features.  Really awesome to
> see!
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Joe
> >> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>



-- 
Sean

Reply via email to