Yes, I assigned NIFI-577 to myself. -- Sean On May 16, 2015 10:43 AM, "Bryan Bende" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wanted this for a while, thanks Joe! > > Has anyone verified they can assign tickets yet? I'm still not seeing the > option right now. > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > yay! thanks for getting this taken care of. > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This has been resolved. INFRA completed the ticket. > > > > > > The following members of the community are listed in the Apache NiFi > > > (incubating) JIRA as contributors: > > > > > > Bryan Bende > > > Dan Bress > > > Joey Echeverria > > > Michael Moser > > > Ricky Saltzer > > > Sean Busbey > > > Toivo Adams > > > Ryan Blue > > > > > > As long as you're listed in there as a contributor you can assign > > > tickets now. Sorry that took so long to get sorted. Also, happy to > > > include other contributors who are interested in being able to do > > > that. Just let us know. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Joe > > > > > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Any reason we cant give sean jira admin to help us improve things? > > > > > > > > On May 3, 2015 7:06 PM, "Sean Busbey" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Assignable user is just who can be listed as an assignee on > > > newly-assigned > > > >> tickets. > > > >> > > > >> Assign issues says only committer+ can assign a ticket to anyone. > > > >> > > > >> So that looks like no self-assignment for contributors. :/ > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Sean > > > >> On May 3, 2015 5:00 PM, "Mark Payne" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Sean, > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Here is what is listed: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Assign Issues > > > >> > Ability to assign issues to other people.Project Role (PMC) > > > >> > Project Role (Committers) > > > >> > Project Role (Administrators) > > > >> > Group (jira-administrators) > > > >> > > > > >> > Assignable User > > > >> > Users with this permission may be assigned to issues.Project Role > > > (PMC) > > > >> > Project Role (Contributors) > > > >> > Project Role (Committers) > > > >> > Project Role (Administrators) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Looks like any contributor can assign to themselves. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > From: [email protected] > > > >> > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 7:07 PM > > > >> > To: [email protected] > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > you probably have the correct one then. that "+lists" email was > made > > > in > > > >> > error when I emailed the jira notification list, I think. > > > >> > > > > >> > Try taking a look at the permissions page: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/NIFI/permissions > > > >> > > > > >> > see what's listed for "Assignable User" and "Assign Issues" > > > >> > > > > >> > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Mark Payne <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > When I go to contributors role I just see “Sean Busbey” - no way > > to > > > >> > > see > > > >> > > what e-mail. But if I type in “busbey" to add you I see “ > > > >> > > [email protected]”?? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > From: Sean Busbey > > > >> > > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 6:21 PM > > > >> > > To: [email protected] > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > hurm. The correct jira account would be "busbey". AFAICT, I > still > > > >> > > can't > > > >> > > assign issues to myself. I even logged out/in to make sure perms > > > >> > > aren't > > > >> > > cached. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Mark Payne < > [email protected]> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Sean, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > You are listed as a contributor already. Did somebody beat me > to > > > it, > > > >> > > > or > > > >> > > > was the wrong account added? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -Mark > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > From: Sean Busbey > > > >> > > > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 6:00 PM > > > >> > > > To: [email protected] > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > one side-effect of switching to 'patch ready' is that folks > who > > > are > > > >> > just > > > >> > > in > > > >> > > > the default 'jira-users' group can no longer assign themselves > > > >> > > > tickets > > > >> > by > > > >> > > > clicking on "start progress." > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > instead, folks need to get added to the "contributor" role in > > the > > > >> > > > jira > > > >> > > > admin page. Could someone add me to that group so I can assign > > > >> > > > myself > > > >> > > > things I'm working on? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Sean Busbey < > > [email protected]> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Sure thing. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > ASF build infra maintains a jenkins job that monitors jira > for > > > new > > > >> > > > > patch-available tickets. For projects that set up a > pre-commit > > > >> > jenkins > > > >> > > > job, > > > >> > > > > that build infra job will kick off a job that applies the > > patch > > > >> > > > > and > > > >> > > tests > > > >> > > > > it according to whatever a particular project wants to test. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Usually it's things like making sure compilation & unit > tests > > > >> > > > > work, > > > >> > > > > checkstyle rules are followed, javadoc warnings don't get > > added, > > > >> > > > > etc. > > > >> > > > Most > > > >> > > > > projects just copy a pre-commit test script from some other > > > >> > > > > project; > > > >> > > many > > > >> > > > > of the test scripts eventually trace back to the Hadoop > > project. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > The Hadoop project recently revamped their pre-commit tester > > so > > > >> > > > > that > > > >> > it > > > >> > > > > can expressly be extended and reused by other projects. I'm > > > >> > > > > already > > > >> > > > trying > > > >> > > > > to use those changes to un-fork precommit testing on the > HBase > > > >> > project, > > > >> > > > so > > > >> > > > > adding it here will be relatively easy for me. It'll also > give > > > me > > > >> > > > > a > > > >> > > great > > > >> > > > > additional data point about how suitable for general use the > > > >> > > > > current > > > >> > > > > framework is. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > It's usually called the QA bot because at the end of running > > > >> > > > > tests, > > > >> > it > > > >> > > > > posts to the jira a comment under that name. The comment > > gives a > > > >> > > > > +/- > > > >> > 1 > > > >> > > > with > > > >> > > > > a detailed report of what was checked and, if needed, where > > > there > > > >> > were > > > >> > > > > problems. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Different communities place different weight on the comments > > > from > > > >> > > > > the > > > >> > > QA > > > >> > > > > bot. Since it's not a PMC member it doesn't have a binding > > vote, > > > >> > > > > so > > > >> > > > > committers are always free to use a judgement call to ignore > > > part > > > >> > > > > of > > > >> > > its > > > >> > > > > feedback. For example, if there's a flakey test or if > someone > > > else > > > >> > > > > is > > > >> > > > > working to unbreak a failing test that got into hte main > > > >> > > > > development > > > >> > > > branch. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Joe Witt < > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Sean, > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> That sounds great to me but must admit I'm not sure we all > > know > > > >> > > > >> what > > > >> > > > >> it really means just yet. Can you elaborate a bit on how > you > > > see > > > >> > > > >> it > > > >> > > > >> best working and what the QA bot will do? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks > > > >> > > > >> joe > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Sean Busbey < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > If you're ready to start using patch-available on the > > > regular, > > > >> > I'll > > > >> > > > >> stand > > > >> > > > >> > up the QA bot this weekend. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > > >> > > > >> > Sean > > > >> > > > >> > On May 2, 2015 3:14 PM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> >> team, > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> >> The ASF INFRA folks have enabled our 'patch ready' > > workflow. > > > >> > This > > > >> > > > >> >> should make it easier for us to see that patches have > been > > > >> > > submitted > > > >> > > > >> >> and so we can prioritize getting them evaluated and > merged > > > >> > > > >> >> above > > > >> > > > other > > > >> > > > >> >> work. All you have to do is once you've made your patch > > and > > > >> > > verified > > > >> > > > >> >> that the build is good to go just attach the patch to > the > > > JIRA > > > >> > > ticket > > > >> > > > >> >> in question and select the 'Submit Patch' button. That > > will > > > >> > change > > > >> > > > >> >> the status of the ticket and we can then sort on those > > > easily. > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> >> We will put together a contributor guide and document > all > > > this > > > >> > > > >> >> so > > > >> > > it > > > >> > > > >> >> isn't such a guessing game as well. > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> >> We're seeing some really great contribs coming in > through > > > >> > > > >> >> various > > > >> > > > >> >> forms be it ideas, defect fixes, new features. Really > > > awesome > > > >> > > > >> >> to > > > >> > > > see! > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> >> Thanks! > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> >> Joe > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > Sean > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > Sean > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > Sean > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean > > >
