Assignable user is just who can be listed as an assignee on newly-assigned tickets.
Assign issues says only committer+ can assign a ticket to anyone. So that looks like no self-assignment for contributors. :/ -- Sean On May 3, 2015 5:00 PM, "Mark Payne" <[email protected]> wrote: > Sean, > > > Here is what is listed: > > > > Assign Issues > Ability to assign issues to other people.Project Role (PMC) > Project Role (Committers) > Project Role (Administrators) > Group (jira-administrators) > > Assignable User > Users with this permission may be assigned to issues.Project Role (PMC) > Project Role (Contributors) > Project Role (Committers) > Project Role (Administrators) > > > > Looks like any contributor can assign to themselves. > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 7:07 PM > To: [email protected] > > > > > > you probably have the correct one then. that "+lists" email was made in > error when I emailed the jira notification list, I think. > > Try taking a look at the permissions page: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/NIFI/permissions > > see what's listed for "Assignable User" and "Assign Issues" > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Mark Payne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > When I go to contributors role I just see “Sean Busbey” - no way to see > > what e-mail. But if I type in “busbey" to add you I see “ > > [email protected]”?? > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sean Busbey > > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 6:21 PM > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > hurm. The correct jira account would be "busbey". AFAICT, I still can't > > assign issues to myself. I even logged out/in to make sure perms aren't > > cached. > > > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Mark Payne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sean, > > > > > > > > > You are listed as a contributor already. Did somebody beat me to it, or > > > was the wrong account added? > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sean Busbey > > > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 6:00 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one side-effect of switching to 'patch ready' is that folks who are > just > > in > > > the default 'jira-users' group can no longer assign themselves tickets > by > > > clicking on "start progress." > > > > > > instead, folks need to get added to the "contributor" role in the jira > > > admin page. Could someone add me to that group so I can assign myself > > > things I'm working on? > > > > > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Sure thing. > > > > > > > > ASF build infra maintains a jenkins job that monitors jira for new > > > > patch-available tickets. For projects that set up a pre-commit > jenkins > > > job, > > > > that build infra job will kick off a job that applies the patch and > > tests > > > > it according to whatever a particular project wants to test. > > > > > > > > Usually it's things like making sure compilation & unit tests work, > > > > checkstyle rules are followed, javadoc warnings don't get added, etc. > > > Most > > > > projects just copy a pre-commit test script from some other project; > > many > > > > of the test scripts eventually trace back to the Hadoop project. > > > > > > > > The Hadoop project recently revamped their pre-commit tester so that > it > > > > can expressly be extended and reused by other projects. I'm already > > > trying > > > > to use those changes to un-fork precommit testing on the HBase > project, > > > so > > > > adding it here will be relatively easy for me. It'll also give me a > > great > > > > additional data point about how suitable for general use the current > > > > framework is. > > > > > > > > It's usually called the QA bot because at the end of running tests, > it > > > > posts to the jira a comment under that name. The comment gives a +/- > 1 > > > with > > > > a detailed report of what was checked and, if needed, where there > were > > > > problems. > > > > > > > > Different communities place different weight on the comments from the > > QA > > > > bot. Since it's not a PMC member it doesn't have a binding vote, so > > > > committers are always free to use a judgement call to ignore part of > > its > > > > feedback. For example, if there's a flakey test or if someone else is > > > > working to unbreak a failing test that got into hte main development > > > branch. > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Sean, > > > >> > > > >> That sounds great to me but must admit I'm not sure we all know what > > > >> it really means just yet. Can you elaborate a bit on how you see it > > > >> best working and what the QA bot will do? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks > > > >> joe > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > If you're ready to start using patch-available on the regular, > I'll > > > >> stand > > > >> > up the QA bot this weekend. > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Sean > > > >> > On May 2, 2015 3:14 PM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> team, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> The ASF INFRA folks have enabled our 'patch ready' workflow. > This > > > >> >> should make it easier for us to see that patches have been > > submitted > > > >> >> and so we can prioritize getting them evaluated and merged above > > > other > > > >> >> work. All you have to do is once you've made your patch and > > verified > > > >> >> that the build is good to go just attach the patch to the JIRA > > ticket > > > >> >> in question and select the 'Submit Patch' button. That will > change > > > >> >> the status of the ticket and we can then sort on those easily. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> We will put together a contributor guide and document all this so > > it > > > >> >> isn't such a guessing game as well. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> We're seeing some really great contribs coming in through various > > > >> >> forms be it ideas, defect fixes, new features. Really awesome to > > > see! > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Thanks! > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Joe > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean > > > > > > -- > Sean
