>(unless there is a GIT sub-module trick I don't know) I believe this to be == TRUE. See the steps - try them then you will understand.
-----Original Message----- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 5:40 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS - NuttX Workflow] On 12/18/2019 4:23 AM, David Sidrane wrote: > That is precisely what submodules do:submodules aggregate on a single SHAL > N repositories. > > The problem is: How to have atomic checkout of the correct configuration > with out a temporal shift? > > Please describe how you would do this. Give detailed steps. I don't see any difference in versioning with submodules. You have to explicitly state the UUID you are using in the submodule (unless there is a GIT sub-module trick I don't know). So how would you checkout the correct configuration with sub-modules. Seems to me that it is the same issue. I would vote about 18billion minus for this change. But architecture designs are not justified by blantant expediency. Let's not go this way.
