GOOD and BAD does not say why. It just says how one feel about something. I get that the system architecture has a clear separate from OS to apps. No question there. I also see the value in NOT having them in 1 repo.
But please bear with me, and let me tease out some "Why" answers on this thread. What I am gapping on is: How are 2 folders in the same directory in a repo the system architecture? What is it about the location in a folder structure that is perceived as the system architecture? Would you please help us to understand this POV (Point Of View). David -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Hartman [mailto:hartman.nat...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 6:49 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS - NuttX Workflow] On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:05 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are three different concepts being discussed here that I think we > should separate. I know that I get confused about which is which. > > 1. Two repositories apps/ and nuttx/ -- GOOD > 2. One respository with apps/ and nuttx/ as folders -- VERY, VERY BAD > 3. Three repositories, apps/, nuttx/ and, say, testing/. Where testing > has the apps/and nuttx/ as submodules -- WORTH CONSIDERING Thanks for summing this up. I think this correctly summarizes what was said before. I agree that #2 is very very bad. Nathan
