I don't like it because it is not the workflow that has been discussed
and I can never support a slam dunk of any workflow that is not
described in the workflow requirements document.
I will vote -1 if we cannot be assured that this this cannot become a
disease that we cannot shake. My proposal:
* It must have time limit of, say, two weeks and require a new vote to
extend it for another two weeks.
* If must immediately become null and void when the proper workflow
requirements are place.
I will merge nothing under this agreement. I will merge nothing until
we have workflow requirements.
This is a kludge intended only for expediency. I cannot support that.
Greg
On 12/22/2019 6:14 PM, Brennan Ashton wrote:
I proposed this because I think it is a solid flow and in alignment with
other stable opensource projects that I contribute to including one under
the FSF complexity.
It is NOT a rush and I don't think it is out of line. Multiple +1 were
given, so I don't think it's that far off what will work.
I think much of the other discussions are far to complex, will prevent
contributions and ignore technologies in favor of theory and principle.
I will be stepping away from all further discussion on the work flow topic
as I have soured on it and don't have a real vote beyond proposing it. As I
said I trust the people I this project so it will workout. When there is a
flow for contributing please announce it and I will try to contribute my
code.
--Brennan
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019, 3:46 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
There are several things I don't like about this proposal:
- It is in complete conflict with everything we have discussed about
the commit workflow
- I think is is suggest out of panic. We have plenty of times to do
things right or to do things better. There will be no pressing need
until the work week begins after the New Year
- It is an emergency measure and absolutely must not become the
default workflow. If we put this in place, how do we get rid of
it? Perhaps it should expire automatically after two weeks?
I will have to vote -1 on this proposal with out some assurance that it
is not a disease that we cannot recover from /EASILY/ without another
vote. I would vote 0 if there there is such an assurance.
Greg
