+1 for nuttx nuttx-apps
Petro Karashchenko kirjoitti lauantai 19. marraskuuta 2022: > Hi, > > My two cents are that I think we should not rock the boat and just remove > "incubator-" prefix from current repos that results in: > > nuttx > nuttx-apps > > Best regards, > Petro > > сб, 19 лист. 2022 р. о 17:03 Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> пише: > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:53 PM Thiago Costa de Paiva wrote: > > > From these, the valid argument is that it would be non-standard (not a > > top level name) related to Appache rules, which I think is indeed not > > acceptable. It would not imply any source code organization change nor > > submodules: > > > > > > git clone <appache url>/nuttx/core nuttx > > > git clone <appache url>/nuttx/apps apps > > > > The use of submodules was also considered before (I also proposed > > that) and turned out to be a bad idea :-) :-) > > > > > > > Anyway, from all the discussion, since hyphens should not be used > > according to what Greg said previously, I think we have only two options: > > > > > > nuttx > > > nuttx_apps > > > > > > Then you are pro option 1 :-) > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:47 PM Nathan Hartman > > <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (..) > > > In the discussion from a few months ago [1] several reasons were given > > > why not to use hyphens in the names (they confuse some tools and > > > underscores are safer). > > > > > > Two possibilities for repo names were given: > > > 1) nuttx and nuttx_apps > > > or > > > 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps > > > > Based on my experience I am pro 2 choice as it clearly distinguishes > > rtos part from the apps part, is a self explanatory at first sight, > > and is more compatible with the potential use cases.. also as Gregory > > explained this nuttx_rtos part is really the whole RTOS part :-) > > > > Best regards :-) > > Tomek > > > > -- > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > >
