That’s right! and underscores are difficult to see when the file name is displayed as an underlined link
you also can’t use underscores with AWS S3 … https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/bucketnamingrules.html Finally, the Google search engine treats, the hyphen( ‘-‘ ) separator as a word separator but the same does not apply to underscores (‘_’) yes, underscore is great for C code because it is the “space which is not a space” - however, for file names, because of the reasons above it’s problematic… I vote for nuttx, nuttx-apps > On Nov 18, 2022, at 7:07 AM, TimH <t...@jti.uk.com.invalid> wrote: > > I see all the other two-word Apache repositories use hyphens not > underscores, and on GitHub they are URLs which as has been pointed out should > ideally be hyphenated? > > To me the underscore looks wrong...but, in the grand scheme of things, it's > just a name and, like Sebastien, I will not lose sleep. I lose enough of that > already, getting trying to get NuttX working on the processor I'm using LOL. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr> >> >> Hi, >> >> I would also very much prefer nuttx and nuttx_apps but the other option will >> not prevent me from sleeping well at night. >> >> Sebastien >> >>> Le 18/11/2022 à 15:46, Gregory Nutt a écrit : >>> >>>> But NuttX has more features than traditional RTOS(e.g. FreeRTOS). >>>> Actually, >>>> Xiaomi uses it in the IoT space which has less real time requirements. >>>> Other similar OS(e.g. Zephyr) doesn't append rtos suffix. >>>> So, I prefer keep nuttx and nuttx-apps. >>> >>> I just endorsed nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps, but Xiao is correct. >>> nuttx_rtos is redundant since nuttx is the name of the RTOS. >>> nuttx_apps are miscellaneous applications tailored for the NuttX RTOS. >>> It really is semantically cleaner. >>> >
