Hi all, Just to bring this to your attention: on my recent PR to esp-hal-3rdparty, an Espressif employee commented stating that support is paused until the ongoing governance discussions are resolved.
Best regards, *--Felipe Moura de Oliveira* Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0> On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 at 10:35 Felipe Moura Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the recent discussion in the thread “Early feedback on RZ/V2H > port and RZ FSP HAL dependency”, I would like to suggest applying the same > idea discussed there to existing vendor HAL dependencies: hosting them > under github.com/NuttX, while keeping them separate from the ASF > repositories. This proposal is aligned with some opinions shared there. > > A practical example is esp-hal-3rdparty. I recently opened a very small > fix there: > > https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15 > > The PR is still open without Espressif review. Interestingly, the > technical feedback so far came from Laczen, a NuttX contributor who is not > part of Espressif. > > This illustrates the issue when NuttX depends on a vendor repository but > the vendor is temporarily unavailable to maintain or review it. > > Would it make sense to move esp-hal-3rdparty, and potentially similar > vendor HAL repositories, under github.com/NuttX, with vendor maintainers > when available but NuttX committers retaining the ability to review and > maintain them when necessary? > > Best regards, > > *--Felipe Moura de Oliveira* > Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0> >
