Hi Matteo, Currently, only NuttX is using https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty. <https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15#issuecomment-5874233033> The reason why freezing is necessary is explained better here <https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15#issuecomment-5890483460> .
Best, Em ter., 29 de set. de 2026 às 10:10, Matteo Golin <[email protected]> escreveu: > Hello Tiago, > > Thanks for the clarification and link. May I ask why the freezing is > technically necessary for the transition? Is it due to potential future > merge conflict issues or something else? I was under the impression that > several other projects are using this HAL, and that the freezing might also > cause them some issues. > > Best, > Matteo > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 8:31 AM Tiago Medicci Serrano < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just to make it clear: the freezing (the comment can be seen here > > < > > > https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15#issuecomment-5874233033 > > >) > > is technically necessary to ease the transition. We've also stopped > > automatic sync so it doesn't create conflicts with existing versions. So, > > it isn't for the bad, but for the good of the community. > > > > We hope the transition can come fast. We've been discussing the best > > options for that. > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Em ter., 29 de set. de 2026 às 03:29, Michal Lenc <[email protected]> > > escreveu: > > > > > That's quite a weird approach. You find a bug in their codebase, but > > > they won't merge the fix because of the discussion unrelated to the > > > issue you fixed. To be honest, I see this as an argument for the > > > independence of 3rd part repositories we can't (at least partially) > > > control. > > > > > > Michal > > > > > > On 9/29/26 01:23, Felipe Moura Oliveira wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Just to bring this to your attention: on my recent PR to > > > esp-hal-3rdparty, > > > > an Espressif employee commented stating that support is paused until > > the > > > > ongoing governance discussions are resolved. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > *--Felipe Moura de Oliveira* > > > > Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 at 10:35 Felipe Moura Oliveira < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > >> > > > >> Following the recent discussion in the thread “Early feedback on > > RZ/V2H > > > >> port and RZ FSP HAL dependency”, I would like to suggest applying > the > > > same > > > >> idea discussed there to existing vendor HAL dependencies: hosting > them > > > >> under github.com/NuttX, while keeping them separate from the ASF > > > >> repositories. This proposal is aligned with some opinions shared > > there. > > > >> > > > >> A practical example is esp-hal-3rdparty. I recently opened a very > > small > > > >> fix there: > > > >> > > > >> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15 > > > >> > > > >> The PR is still open without Espressif review. Interestingly, the > > > >> technical feedback so far came from Laczen, a NuttX contributor who > is > > > not > > > >> part of Espressif. > > > >> > > > >> This illustrates the issue when NuttX depends on a vendor repository > > but > > > >> the vendor is temporarily unavailable to maintain or review it. > > > >> > > > >> Would it make sense to move esp-hal-3rdparty, and potentially > similar > > > >> vendor HAL repositories, under github.com/NuttX, with vendor > > > maintainers > > > >> when available but NuttX committers retaining the ability to review > > and > > > >> maintain them when necessary? > > > >> > > > >> Best regards, > > > >> > > > >> *--Felipe Moura de Oliveira* > > > >> Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
