Hi Matteo,

Sorry for the delay in replying. Here is the link as requested:
https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15

I am willing to make the adjustments suggested by Laczen, but I am
currently unsure if doing so will lead to it being merged.

Unfortunately, it is a frustrating situation. My solution depends on power
consumption, and I am improving what I can, but I ran into this issue which
seems to be tied to the Espressif HAL.

Best regards,


Em ter., 29 de set. de 2026 às 10:39, Tiago Medicci Serrano <
[email protected]> escreveu:

> Hi Matteo,
>
> Currently, only NuttX is using
> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty.
> <
> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15#issuecomment-5874233033
> >
> The
> reason why freezing is necessary is explained better here
> <
> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15#issuecomment-5890483460
> >
> .
>
> Best,
>
> Em ter., 29 de set. de 2026 às 10:10, Matteo Golin <[email protected]
> >
> escreveu:
>
> > Hello Tiago,
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification and link. May I ask why the freezing is
> > technically necessary for the transition? Is it due to potential future
> > merge conflict issues or something else? I was under the impression that
> > several other projects are using this HAL, and that the freezing might
> also
> > cause them some issues.
> >
> > Best,
> > Matteo
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 8:31 AM Tiago Medicci Serrano <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just to make it clear: the freezing (the comment can be seen here
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15#issuecomment-5874233033
> > > >)
> > > is technically necessary to ease the transition. We've also stopped
> > > automatic sync so it doesn't create conflicts with existing versions.
> So,
> > > it isn't for the bad, but for the good of the community.
> > >
> > > We hope the transition can come fast. We've been discussing the best
> > > options for that.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > Em ter., 29 de set. de 2026 às 03:29, Michal Lenc <
> [email protected]>
> > > escreveu:
> > >
> > > > That's quite a weird approach. You find a bug in their codebase, but
> > > > they won't merge the fix because of the discussion unrelated to the
> > > > issue you fixed. To be honest, I see this as an argument for the
> > > > independence of 3rd part repositories we can't (at least partially)
> > > > control.
> > > >
> > > > Michal
> > > >
> > > > On 9/29/26 01:23, Felipe Moura Oliveira wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just to bring this to your attention: on my recent PR to
> > > > esp-hal-3rdparty,
> > > > > an Espressif employee commented stating that support is paused
> until
> > > the
> > > > > ongoing governance discussions are resolved.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *--Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> > > > > Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 at 10:35 Felipe Moura Oliveira <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Following the recent discussion in the thread “Early feedback on
> > > RZ/V2H
> > > > >> port and RZ FSP HAL dependency”, I would like to suggest applying
> > the
> > > > same
> > > > >> idea discussed there to existing vendor HAL dependencies: hosting
> > them
> > > > >> under github.com/NuttX, while keeping them separate from the ASF
> > > > >> repositories. This proposal is aligned with some opinions shared
> > > there.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> A practical example is esp-hal-3rdparty. I recently opened a very
> > > small
> > > > >> fix there:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://github.com/espressif/esp-hal-3rdparty/pull/15
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The PR is still open without Espressif review. Interestingly, the
> > > > >> technical feedback so far came from Laczen, a NuttX contributor
> who
> > is
> > > > not
> > > > >> part of Espressif.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This illustrates the issue when NuttX depends on a vendor
> repository
> > > but
> > > > >> the vendor is temporarily unavailable to maintain or review it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Would it make sense to move esp-hal-3rdparty, and potentially
> > similar
> > > > >> vendor HAL repositories, under github.com/NuttX, with vendor
> > > > maintainers
> > > > >> when available but NuttX committers retaining the ability to
> review
> > > and
> > > > >> maintain them when necessary?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best regards,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> *--Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
> > > > >> Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 

*--Felipe Moura de Oliveira*
Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/felipe-oliveira-75a651a0>

Reply via email to