David just mentioned the Tree Widget being used by the blog. Maybe we just need
to include the basic-tree class.
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian,
do we really need them?
The ecommerce is not using the widgets and at first look it is working
fine.
Jacopo
Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
Please don't commit it until the new styles are added to ecommain.css.
-Adrian
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
...
I think it would be best if we could hold off on committing
OFBIZ-754 and OFBIZ-671 for a little while longer. I have been
refactoring the Party Manager component as a test bed for the UI
refactoring initiative, and even though that work is nearly done,
I'm still finding ways to improve the main style sheet and widgets.
Bottom line is, they aren't fully cooked.
I've applied the new styles:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-754
the form widget refactoring:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-671
and the party example:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-763
and they all seem pretty good to me.
I'd suggest to commit everything to svn and then force the community
to test it ;-)
In this way we will get more feedback and will speed up the
refinement of this effort.
I can commit the work if there are no objections, but before I go on
I'd love to get committers' feedback, especially on OFBIZ-671.
Jacopo
From my perspective, the ideal scenario would be to have another
contributor take on one of the other components and start
refactoring it using the new style sheet and widgets. They can see
if there is anything lacking in the new versions and improve upon
what I've done so far (if necessary). When they give a nod of
approval, then we can get the new style sheet and widgets committed
to the project.
If anyone has a better plan, please suggest it.
-Adrian
