One year old but still interesting : http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxiancom-2006-survey-results
Jacques De : "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sorry, jQuery is released under a dual licence : also MIT :o) > http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/MIT-LICENSE.txt > > Jacques > > De : "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I do not know much about it (I did not use it yet) but I know that jQuery > > http://jquery.com/ is winning more and more fans... It's > > not a framework but more a toolkit, I like this idea and with a very, very > > small size (though inside OFBiz this should not worry > us > > too much ;o). Licence : GPL > > > > Jacques > > > > De : "Vikash Anand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Dear All; > > > I have one more contender to add in the list and that is DWR. DWR > > > is built on top of Ajax and built using Direct Remoting will help us to > > > get > > > things using Ajax way with less/no dependence on UI libraries that others > > > provide. This will help us to write simple Java methods to execute > > > functionalities and very user friendly to write either java code, JS code > > > and XML files. > > > > > > Please let me know your coments. I will be working on it's integration and > > > will try to provide a sample/patch soon. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards; > > > Vikash Anand. > > > > > > On 7/30/07, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good question... Right now these are mainly used for special > > > > pages and we don't really have framework use of these yet, so I'd say at > > > > this point we'll just have to see how things shake out! > > > > > > > > The two main contenders in our discussions about this were Prototype and > > > > DOJO... so hopefully we won't have too much others coming in that will > > > > need > > > > to be shaken out. If necessary we'll trim one of these, but we might > > > > even > > > > want to keep both... I don't know though... > > > > > > > > Does anyone else have any thoughts on the best thing to do here? > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott Gray wrote: > > > > > I thought we were using dojo after much discussion a couple of months > > > > back? > > > > > Are we intending to use multiple libraries? > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > > On 30/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> Author: apatel > > > > >> Date: Sun Jul 29 20:45:00 2007 > > > > >> New Revision: 560854 > > > > >> > > > > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=560854 > > > > >> Log: > > > > >> Prototype and Scriptaculous javascript libs. > > > > >> > > > > >> Added: > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/ > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/builder.js > > > > >> > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/controls.js > > > > >> > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/dragdrop.js > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/effects.js > > > > >> > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/prototype.js > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/scriptaculous.js > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/slider.js > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/sound.js > > > > >> > > > > >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/unittest.js > > > > >> > > > > ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/prototypejs/validation.js > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
