+1
Also for developers, we need to address the problem with pullAllPluginsSource For now you need to use the task each time you switch a branch and be
careful with your changes (stashes them).
Jacques
Le 11/02/2020 à 08:48, Gil Portenseigne a écrit :
+1
Regards,
Gil
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:02:18PM +0100, Nicolas Malin wrote:
Hi,
I most in favor to propose two products like :
"Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework)
and
"Apache OFBiz Full 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
For advanced user, they would use the framework only and retrieve wanted
plugins.
For discovery, the full version would be available and recommended.
I don't think that publish plugins alone or each plugin alone would be
an interest for user
Nicolas
On 08/02/2020 11:04, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the first
release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the first
one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a
few decisions to take.
Should we release two products or just one as in the past?
Two products mean:
"Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01"
and
"Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"
One product mean"
"Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times; first
publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year
publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen then we
could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the same
release of the framework.
One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones that
we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file.
Thanks,
Jacopo
pub RSA 3072/ECF12FF4 2019-12-16 Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr>
sub RSA 3072/40C9B367 2019-12-16
