Oh, I see. You're right. Contributing back some common functions is
great.:)


在 2008-09-13六的 08:37 -0600,David E Jones写道:
> On Sep 13, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Shi Yusen wrote:
> 
> > David,
> >
> > Great to know your guys have more and more consulting business!
> 
> Well, I wasn't actually referring to the business I'm involved in, but  
> rather a more general trend, based on a notice of how certain people  
> have been notably absent from participation in the last few months who  
> were significantly more active before.
> 
> > Then, should there be a rule/promise to control the time split of
> > commitors? 50:50? I think customers can understand such conditions.
> 
> Have you really thought this through?
> 
> First off, how would the open source project enforce such a rule? Or  
> if you meant for a business to self impose the rule, why would they?
> 
> Second, how could a consulting company remain profitable after  
> throwing away 50% of its potential profits? That may be possible in  
> China selling to US/EU/etc where wages are typically low locally and  
> hourly fees have less downward price pressure, but that's not true in  
> the USA. For the business I'm involved in, and every consulting  
> business I've ever been involved in, the profit percentage is not even  
> near 50%, and during periods of growth with significant investments in  
> training usually the profit percentage is in the uncomfortable single  
> digit range. In other words, taking out 50% of potential profits would  
> generally cause the business to hit bankruptcy as soon as cash  
> reserves are consumed by the large monthly losses (and most smaller  
> and newer services businesses, like most of the ones around OFBiz)  
> also don't have large cash reserves. In other words, a policy like  
> this would kill a company within a few months. If OFBiz as an open  
> source project were somehow to enforce such a policy it would destroy  
> all services companies within a few months, and the open source  
> project would be a ghost town a few months after.
> 
> In general most contributions coming into OFBiz are the result of the  
> need of an end-user company. The way they become part of OFBiz is that  
> either the employees or contractors helping the end-user company make  
> it a priority to develop in such a way that as much as possible can be  
> contributed to OFBiz. What this usually means is using a combination  
> of generic and configurable features going into the open source  
> project, and then customizations and configurations used to bridge the  
> last gap between what newly exists in the open source project, and  
> what the client actually needs.
> 
> In other words, most functionality comes from paying work, and not  
> from people guessing about new features, then implementing and  
> contributing them out of good will. Also, most good functionality is  
> driven by real-world requirements that someone is willing to pay for,  
> and most of the stuff people develop by guessing about what is needed  
> end up being useless and eventually eliminated from the project (I  
> know this from hundreds of thousands of lines of my own work turning  
> out to be useless, and most of that is long gone from the project!).
> 
> So no, this policy would not be good for any service provider  
> business, or for the open source project.
> 
> The best policy for service provider companies and end-user company  
> employees working on OFBiz is to make contributions back to the open  
> source project a priority, and use some of the techniques I mentioned  
> above to facilitate this and make more of it possible and even natural.
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> > 在 2008-09-12五的 09:59 -0600,David E. Jones写道:
> >> Thanks again for working on this Jacopo. I made some edits and  
> >> added a few little comments, and I can't think of
> >> anything else to put in there, so to me that means it's ready to  
> >> submit. ;)
> >>
> >> Comments and informal votes are welcome. I'll submit this later  
> >> today or tomorrow.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> >>> This is a draft for the Board Report for OFBiz, due this month.
> >>> Please review,
> >>>
> >>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report 
> >>> +2008-09+DRAFT
> >>>
> >>> Jacopo
> >>>
> >
> 

Reply via email to