To be clear (from French definition in Wikipedia iCalendar)
Transparency : determines whether the resource affected at an event is made
unavailable (OPAQUE, TRANSPARENT)
From my POV, it's strange words used for availability !
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I know in scheduling it is if the time is free or committed.
like a task may not take any time but does have a place in the events of doing
something. Maybe a tickler to check something.
Yes it'is from Transparent/Opaque in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICalendar (actually more in
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICalendar#Ev.C3.A9nements_.28VEVENT.29)
I don't know any use in OFBiz and did not find anyting related too.
So, yes enumeration seems better than numeric. Maybe a misinterpreatation related to windows's opacity in UI (often 0 to 10 is
used) ?
Jacques
Adrian Crum wrote:
The TimeTransparency field in the WorkEffort entity appears to be unused.
I believe the field was inspired by the iCalendar specification, but I don't understand why it was given a numeric data type. It
seems to me this should be an enumeration: Transparent or Opaque.
Does anyone have any insight into if/how the TimeTransparency field is used in
OFBiz?
-Adrian
