Getting together at the Apachecon 2009 in Amsterdam would be a good opportunity to announce the new release (policy) to the public.
Who is visiting that event? 2009/1/16 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > +1 (for Ubuntu like) > > Jacques > > From: "Bruno Busco" <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> > >> > >> >>> How we want to do this is a good question. I suppose defining a release >>> >>> target is the way to go, and we can use that for bug reporting after the >>> branch is created as well. >>> >>> >> Yes, this is the way JIRA is supposed to be used. >> >> >> If we do that this next release could simply be "release2009", or if we >>> want to be more specific and perhaps use the Ubuntu model (and assuming >>> we're planning for a release in March) we could use something like >>> "release9.3". I think I like the simple release2009 better... >>> >>> Any other opinions? >>> >>> >> I would prefer the "release9.3" scheme, since it will allow us to have >> more >> that one release in a year (just in case). It will give very soon a more >> precise indication of the time in which the release was done. >> >> The version string can be created in JIRA as release9.3, than, if for any >> reason we miss the month (or if we finish earlier) we will rename it. >> >> If there are no objections I will create a "release 9.3" version scheduled >> for march 2009. >> >> -Bruno >> >> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Bruno Busco wrote: >>> >>> David, >>> >>>> could you create the new version in JIRA so that we can schedule these >>>> issues on it and have them displayed in the Road Map? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Bruno >>>> >>>> 2009/1/16 David E Jones <david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>>>> >>>>> David E Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> What do we still have that is up in the air for refactoring, >>>>>> cleanups, >>>>>> >>>>>>> and enhancements? I know quite a few have been worked on recently but >>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>> not sure of their exact status, but here are some that come to mind: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1868 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, that would be a good one to get done. >>>>> >>>>> There may also be other framework versus apps issues that need to be >>>>> resolved, actually I know there are (Bruno brought one up today in >>>>> fact). >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>
