Anil Patel wrote: >> Part of the point (if I remember right) of putting permission logic >> into little services was to help keep it consistent when that service >> is called in multiple places, especially in the input processing >> service and the output generating screen. > How is writing "acctgInvoicePermissionCheck" different from > "update:acctmgr:invoice". I cannot interpret anything out of > acctgInvoicePermissionCheck but string does tell me something which goes > in line with convention over configurations practice.
acctmgr:invoice:update would be better, imho. But I can see it argued both ways.
