Tim, Let me first say that i appreciate the things you and your people have done to OFbiz but is that a reason to write such a flame message? Yes i know you contributed a lot similar to what we (I and my people) have done.
However it sure looks like we have a different focus supporting OFBiz, I am most interested filling the functional gaps that exist in the system, you seem to have most interest in improving existing functions and presentation and html/css. Doesn't that fit together well? Most (all?) of the comments of you and your people i have implemented. So lets stop this flame, i can already tell you that if you find a wrongly named variable or a few styles in some ftl code, you sure can mention them to me and we will try to correct it and we are not offended if you correct it yourself.... lets work together, regards, Hans On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 08:43 -0600, Tim Ruppert wrote: > Agreed, the SFA system definitely needs a lot of love and hopefully > with additional discussion going on in the community we can get some > more traction on that. At this point, we are using it internally, but > haven't had enough time to spend on enhancing this application to the > fullest. > > First of all, company based attacks will not be tolerated my friend - > please stop it, it makes you look bad and continues to erode faith. > This is me coming after you for your carelessness, has nothing to do > with my company, so feel free to remember that before you slop this up > here. But if you'd like to talk about contributions and what _we've_ > been doing, here you go. > > Instead of working on SFA, which btw hasn't seemed to be a have a huge > push from the community, we've been spending our time and money > working on rebranding the applications, enhancing the accounting > application, cleaning up all of the amazingly outdated HTML in the > system, adding additional tests to enhance stability, adding and > cleaning up lots of integrations, and adding features to the eCommerce > application where they were lacking. Would you like me to list all of > those and the commit messages to go along with them or can we agree > that they would dwarf the garbage you've thrown out below? > > The other thing we spend a lot of time on is cleaning up your code and > ensuring that your flippant commits don't hurt the system. This slight > of hand to look at the grossly neglected SFA system is a cute > distraction, but remember the point - you are not following the best > practices laid down by the community - not our company - and if you > continue you to - I can't imagine why you'd be able to be given the > power to keep doing it. > > Do your work, help the community, follow the guidelines, or stop > wasting everyone's time. > > Cheers, > Ruppert > > On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > Can we expect any results on this? > > > > OBIZ-1644 Screens to manage Calendar in SFA webapp > > Anil K Patel 14/Feb/08 > > > > OFBIZ-1645 Screens to manage Forecast in SFA webapp > > Anil K Patel 15/Feb/08 > > > > OFBIZ-2364 Competitors & Partners - Sales Force Automation component > > Vikas Mayur 27/Apr/09 > > > > OFBIZ-2363 Improvements in Sales Force Automation component > > Vikas Mayur 27/Apr/09 > > > > OFBIZ-2363 Improvements in "Contact" Screens > > Ashish Vijaywargiya 27/Apr/09 > > > > OFBIZ-2363 Improvements in "Lead" Screens > > Ashish Vijaywargiya 27/Apr/09 > > > > OFBIZ-2427 Cases - Sales Force Automation component > > Ashish Vijaywargiya 06/May/09 > > > > Some systems only got successful having CRM/SFA as one of the major > > components...... > > > > -- > > http://www.antwebsystems.com : > > Quality OFBiz support for competitive rates.... > > > -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
