Thanks Ashish, Hans,
Yes I agree on the invoke part. I will see how to handle all this gloabaly
(using regexp I guess)
Jacques
From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com>
Hello Jacques,
The following changes are good:
- <request-map uri="FindSubscriptionResource"><security https="true"
auth="true"/><response name="success" type="view"
value="FindSubscriptionResource"/></request-map>
- <request-map uri="EditSubscriptionResource"><security https="true"
auth="true"/><response name="success" type="view"
value="EditSubscriptionResource"/></request-map>
+ <request-map uri="FindSubscriptionResource">
+ <security https="true" auth="true"/>
+ <response name="success" type="view"
value="FindSubscriptionResource"/>
+ </request-map>
+ <request-map uri="EditSubscriptionResource">
+ <security https="true" auth="true"/>
+ <response name="success" type="view"
value="EditSubscriptionResource"/>
+ </request-map>
*But* I don't like the changes for moving "invoke" attribute to the new
line:
- <event type="java" path="org.ofbiz.product.product.ProductEvents"
invoke="updateProductQuickAdminShipping"/>
+ <event type="java" path="org.ofbiz.product.product.ProductEvents"
+ invoke="updateProductQuickAdminShipping"/>
And for view map entries - +1.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I often found myself in difficulties when reading controllers files.
I would like to format them all as it's done on the attached example
http://n4.nabble.com/file/n623986/controller.patch controller.patch , but
the view-maps which I would prefer to keep on one line.
Opinions ?
Thanks
Jacques
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Formatting-controllers-tp623986p623986.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
