Yes. Look at the Label Manager code - it outputs well-formed XML. Some day this will be easy to do in mini-language, but it's not quite there. You can read and write XML files, but there is no way to add the Apache license header in mini-language.
-Adrian --- On Fri, 11/20/09, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > From: Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > Subject: Re: Formatting controllers > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 1:36 PM > Do you mean I could even easily > format with this code ? > Like what I did in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=882536&view=rev > > Jacques > > From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com> > > Don't forget the framework includes code to read and > write XML files, and you can specify the indentation level. > > > > -Adrian > > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Thanks David, Tim, > >> > >> Yes, actually I'd like to have them consistent. > >> Not for the sake of consistency but because it's > easier to read when there is a sole pattern used. > >> Your eyes don't have to adapt from a line to the > other, less eyeballs work. > >> And I find it easier to not have all on one line. > >> > >> This said, I was expecting to use Oxygen in > Eclipse to format blocks, but this seems not possible, I > found only Ctrl+Shft+F which formats all the file > >> Using regexp is then the solution but much more > harder and risky... > >> > >> I will see, I have some issues with Oxygen and > it's hard to get them fixed. > >> You have to make a lot of exchange and to explain > all things wich much much details. > >> To such an extent that the work is almost done... > >> > >> I'm good to find frustration :/ > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com> > >>> "consistent enough" is tough when it slips > thru the crack and it's not always consistent. I > have to admit to liking it being explicit - but it's > really trivial enough to go either way. Some people > put the bracket on the same line - some the > next. You really just have to pick a guideline > and stick to it as far as I'm concerned. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Ruppert > >>> > >>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:44 PM, David E Jones > wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Ashish > Vijaywargiya wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello Jacques, > >>>>> > >>>>> The following changes are good: > >>>>> - <request-map > uri="FindSubscriptionResource"><security > https="true" > >>>>> auth="true"/><response > name="success" type="view" > >>>>> > value="FindSubscriptionResource"/></request-map> > >>>>> - <request-map > uri="EditSubscriptionResource"><security > https="true" > >>>>> auth="true"/><response > name="success" type="view" > >>>>> > value="EditSubscriptionResource"/></request-map> > >>>>> + <request-map > uri="FindSubscriptionResource"> > >>>>> + > <security https="true" auth="true"/> > >>>>> + > <response name="success" type="view" > >>>>> value="FindSubscriptionResource"/> > >>>>> + </request-map> > >>>>> + <request-map > uri="EditSubscriptionResource"> > >>>>> + > <security https="true" auth="true"/> > >>>>> + > <response name="success" type="view" > >>>>> value="EditSubscriptionResource"/> > >>>>> + </request-map> > >>>> > >>>> I disagree. That change turns one line > into four, and the pattern for those entries is > generally consistent enough that reading beyond the > first 50 characters or so it totally redundant information. > >>>> > >>>> -David > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> *But* I don't like the changes for > moving "invoke" attribute to the new > >>>>> line: > >>>>> > >>>>> - <event > type="java" > path="org.ofbiz.product.product.ProductEvents" > >>>>> > invoke="updateProductQuickAdminShipping"/> > >>>>> + <event > type="java" > path="org.ofbiz.product.product.ProductEvents" > >>>>> + > invoke="updateProductQuickAdminShipping"/> > >>>>> > >>>>> And for view map entries - +1. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Ashish > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:44 PM, > Jacques Le Roux < > >>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I often found myself in > difficulties when reading controllers files. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I would like to format them all as > it's done on the attached example > >>>>>> http://n4.nabble.com/file/n623986/controller.patch > controller.patch , but > >>>>>> the view-maps which I would prefer > to keep on one line. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Opinions ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>> -- View this message in context: > >>>>>> http://n4.nabble.com/Formatting-controllers-tp623986p623986.html > >>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing > list archive at Nabble.com. > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > >
