On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > On 4/12/2009, at 1:05 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> If you want to review these commits why not check them in the birt >> branch...there they are separated. > > I'm not so concerned about myself but more for others and in particular > people looking at the commit history in the future. > The integration and the examples are completely different subject matters are > should be treated as such when committing to the trunk regardless of how > they've been committed to the branch.
How would one separate them when committing them to the trunk? Typically merging a branch with the trunk involves a single commit in order to keep it simple. It doesn't have to be that way, but it nice to simply say branch rev X was merged into the trunk at trunk rev Y. -David
