From: "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com>
On 19/12/2009, at 10:09 AM, David E Jones wrote:
On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 19/12/2009, at 9:44 AM, David E Jones wrote:
I agree with this and tried to make this point early on in the
discussion. We should be able to include these files just fine in
source form, as long as they are not modified.
You didn't try very hard, I responded to you and you didn't reply.
I'm not into shouting into the wind any more. I used to be, but not
any more. That's why I won't try to argue this one either.
Eventually people will tire of fighting, and then something will
happen. I'm perfectly willing to wait.
I'm sending an email to legal-discuss now. The frustrating thing from
my point of view is that this was discussed and the code of concern
was subsequently removed from the branch but then added back in when
BIRT came into the trunk. An email to legal-discuss should have been
sent over a month ago and I don't think it was my responsibility to do
so.
Thanks Scott,
I agree it should have been done at least before this code was commited
Jacques
Regards
Scott